"'Get a license or do not sample,' the court said Tuesday. 'We do not see this as stifling creativity in any significant way.' "MPAA just bit itself in the ass with the anti-piracy laws. Now every artist who samples another artists song MUST pay for it.
The organization of any complex arrangement hinges on the interplay of seemingly haphazard individual events.
Wednesday, September 08, 2004
Court Rules That All Musical Samples Must Be Paid For
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(470)
-
▼
September
(43)
- Blogs I check daily...
- Nice Ride: The Hydrogen Gremlin
- 'Are You Using Anything?'
- Politics
- Make our lives simpler...
- From "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy"
- Blog Search Engine
- Whatcha think?
- NOYB
- Internet Addiction
- *sniff* It's beautiful!
- Hold and Blow
- Random Sexual Fact
- Confessions of an elephant polo groupie
- Sha Na Na flop hurts Anderson Y
- The first and last stories are worth reading...
- How do you spend your Saturday nights?
- Two years' water left
- Click me to view.
- How about a barter?
- Which FARK Cliche Are You?
- Williams' daughter kept in the dark
- Top Ten Stories of Revenge
- Duped again...
- Leather...
- Finally a niche yet to be covered
- Hotlinking from Userfriendly.
- Thanks Mikey
- Goatee
- Headache
- and blah.
- MMM sweet sweet compensation...
- At least things don't suck this bad...
- Boy builds business from barrowed bank cards.
- Pessimism and every moment after...
- Where is the Muslim outrage?
- Court Rules That All Musical Samples Must Be Paid For
- old repost (but still true)
- Yay!
- I need to read more...
- BIG LEAGUE CHEW: NOW AND THEN!
- Help a friend out...
-
▼
September
(43)
1 comment:
Well, since the MPAA is made up of the record companies who will charging and getting charged I'm pretty sure there will be a work around for this.
Post a Comment